“40% of us have seen UAPs” – Airline Pilot Chris Van Voorhis

2 Comments

The airlines are still discouraging their pilots from talking about the UFOs they’ve seen, but it’s more of a gray area than a rule.

Now that over 40 % of the US public admits that some UFOs are real and of non-human origin, the airlines are telling pilots that it’s OK to talk about their UFO sightings, but don’t mention the name of the airlines.

Unfortunately, pilots find it difficult to trust an airline corporation with a plastic fork, let alone trusting them with their careers. So these highly reliable UFO witnesses still fear retribution, ridicule, and job loss if they speak out about what 40 to 50% of them have seen.

Lucky for us, a few of them are fearless, like Pilot Chris Van Voorhis.

The airlines’ motivation for their part of the UFO coverup appears to be financial. They don’t want the public to know that their own pilots are seeing UFOs. This might give the airline a bad reputation.

To me, an airline’s reputation would improve if it went out of its way to do the right thing for flight safety by studying and reporting UFO sightings openly to the public. Successful businesses have to develop emotional-trust relationships with customers, and the foundation of trust is open, honest communication.

Since UFOs are a safety hazard according to military pilots who have encountered hundreds of them in recent years, any airline company that fails to study and report UFO encounters deserves a bad reputation of criminal negligence.

The first airline with the uncommon wisdom and courage to begin a scientific study of UFOs will instantly become the favorite of the traveling public. Especially if their commercials detail their findings and brag about the contrast between their own safety standards and those of their careless competition who are still living in the past with rules of silencing their pilots on UFOs.

It’s high time the world’s airline corporations grew up and began acting like responsible adults.

Of course, it’s possible that some government agency is quietly telling them they’d better keep the lid on UFOs or else. The US shadow government, as best I can tell, is still in control of mainstream information flow in the West. (On both sides of politics.)

Here’s the man, Chris Van Voorhis, another airline pilot with excellent credentials describing his two UFO encounters, each of which involved multiple witnesses.

I especially appreciate his open-minded spiritual views now that his world is less black-and-white than it once was…

“Think of the trouble that [UFO misidentification] could cause, even if you don’t acknowledge it, right? If we know we have objects in our airspace doing things… I mean what about the opportunity for miscommunication with another nation? We think it’s them versus something else because we’re pretending that there isn’t a third party.” — Ryan Graves.

The recent cluster of apparently unidentified “floating” objects shot down by the US military might be an example of this miscommunication, or it might be something more along the lines of Dr. Greer’s unpopular scenario in which the military-industrial-intelligence complex tries to pull off a UFO hoax in hopes of creating another profitable war. This idea doesn’t sound quite so far-fetched now.

Personally, I doubt the recently floating, now destroyed objects over the US were genuine UFOs. But who knows?

The brain-dead media on one side of politics would like the public to lump these balloon-like objects together with genuine UFOs and draw the binary uninformed conclusion that all UFOs/UAPs are mundane human constructions. Nothing could be further from the truth.

The brain-dead media on the other side of politics wants to leave room for genuine UFOs, perhaps even aliens. But this makes it temporarily political…

If this difference can be made permanently political, the whole thing can be easily laid to rest, especially if the conservative side happens to be a bit closer to the truth that “needs to be covered up.” Sorry to say, silencing conservative opinion has become an art from online. No matter how liberal any of us are, it’s impossible to deny this growing artifact of Western “culturescape.”

Despite their chronic toxic division, both sides of the political media seem to agree that these “unidentified” objects are worth getting angry about. After all, anger draws viewers and sells advertising space. That’s the lasting purpose of all mainstream “news” on both sides: making money.

As the CNN article linked above notes, “there is bipartisan support for shooting the objects down.”

I would suggest that this bipartisan agreement should be interpreted as evidence that both sides of mainstream “news,” like DC politics, are largely controlled by a few people with an overarching agenda that is anything but world peace. Maybe the real agenda is just money for the military-industrial-intelligence complex, maybe it’s WEF global control, a contract with Gray Aliens, a cult of Antarctic Nazi racists, world-bank family security, a Chinese communist plot, all of the above, none of the above, etc.

The possibilities of hidden agenda are fascinating and fun to write short fiction about, but reaching anything other than a tentative conclusion is probably impossible because of the cleverness of those who have hidden the truth about UFOs for, as best I can tell, many centuries at least.

Wondering about agendas is great sport, but I’m a lot more concerned that humanity learns to live in peace. UFO politics and coverups are important to me largely because they may play a part in developing lasting human peace by helping us grow ethically, morally and spiritually. This is the potential UFO disclosure payoff that I see for humanity.

There’s a cycle we’ve probably all heard: “Weak men create hard times, hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men.”

Intuitively, this seems accurate to me. Tough times in which children are starving to death create tough people who fight and kill to keep their dying loved ones alive. Led by the toughest among them, they invade other nations, they kill men, women and children, take over the land and rule with an iron fist. But if they become successful for long enough, poverty and starvation become a distant memory. Those in power become more peaceful, more safety conscious, and the public becomes theoretically altruistic in their values.

So far in known history, no well-fed peaceful population has conquered global hunger. Those with starvation-level poverty eventually rise up as “hard men.” They invade other nations, conquer the well-fed complacent nations, and save their loved ones from hunger.

Other factors like salt and energy enter the picture, of course, since they contribute to nutrition and survival. And as I’m always saying, complex systems almost never behave in simple ways, but…

This “hard men” idea is a useful over-simplification because it helps us focus on what the world really needs:

  1. We in the West need loving hearts that cause us to actually do something to end world hunger, something other than donating billions to corrupt leaders who keep our money and let the people starve.
  2. As long as there’s starvation level poverty in the world, we need to realize that these people will eventually come after us, take everything that keeps us alive and save their own families. It’s human nature, most of us would probably do similar things if our kids were starving.
  3. We need to learn respect and appreciation for both types of individuals, the so- called “toxically masculine” (or “hard men”) and the so-called “snowflakes.” Both are essential to human survival. In a physical fight for your immediate survival, you need the toughest “men” of any gender to pilot your aircraft and risk their lives in the sea, on the ground and out in space. It’s no place for gentle, sensitive, fearful souls. And in a long-term global fight against poverty, you desperately need empathetic people of any gender who care deeply about the poor, enough to dedicate their entire lives and careers to helping them. This job, vital to the ultimate survival of the human species, doesn’t call for war-hardened heroes.

And we really ought to stop shooting down UFOs while we’re at it, because sooner or later one of them will turn out to be a genuine UFO with some sort of non-human intelligence aboard and…

“Maybe we can even learn from them how not to have conflicts with each other.” – Chris Van Voorhis

Great idea, Chris! Fantastic interview, dude.

…

Unidentified Balloon Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

The World Economic Forum on Video

Leave a comment

Mark Moss is not the poster child of objectivity in his presentation of the WEF, but at least he does show a few video clips of these people telling us what they plan to do to us and how.

The question of why they’re determined to control us completely is a matter of perspective.

To give the WEF the benefit of the doubt, imagine you were a wealthy, powerful stakeholder with controlling interest in one of the world’s largest corporations. You might likely believe that the average person needs to be saved from him or herself because he or she is genuinely too ignorant to know the best path forward for humanity. Despite your busy schedule and the fact that people in charge of major corporations and governments don’t have any time to read deeply into any subject, you would assume that you know more than the average person about important issues because everything worth knowing is summarized and brought to your attention by the brilliant experts you pay to keep you informed. The fact that you hired these people in a process that screens them for political and scientific opinions that agree with your own would likely seem appropriate to you. This screening process places you in a biased information bubble that would not bother you even if you realized what a dangerous thing you’d done to yourself, because you’re a human being who “knows” you’re right about the important things. After all, look how successful you are. You’re rarely wrong about anything.

On the other hand, giving the WEF less benefit of the doubt, we have to face the apparent fact that narcissists, sociopaths and even high-functioning psychopaths tend to rise to the top of social power structures whether inside the US government, the corporate world, religious organizations, gangs, or within the pecking order of prison.

This observation is difficult to internalize because nobody wants to be unhappy, and it seems obvious that unhappy people often hold such pessimistic worldviews.

So maybe it’s best not to believe the apparent truth about the power advantages of human predators. Maybe it’s better to think that some leadership positions require the unusually thick skin of a person with no real empathy and virtually no emotions besides sexual lust, greed for control, and anger when they don’t get what they want.

After all, nature includes predators who perform bloody kills that are valuable to the balance of Earth’s ecosystems.

Maybe it’s supposed to be this way in human social relationships, too, especially if “scientific” materialism is an accurate view of the universe.

I totally doubt it, but…

Whatever worldview you assume in understanding human predators, we know they exist and tend to rise to the top in many situations. So it’s likely that at least a significant portion of the people at the top of the World Economic Forum, whether they know it or not, are predatory individuals motivated by the lust for power and control.

After all, when you’ve got more money than you can ever hope to spend, you’ve done all the expensive island trips, and you’ve bought so many boats, farms, and US senators that they’ve lost their entertainment value, what’s left?

Perhaps a lust for power and world domination, combined with the narcissistic head rush of publicly “saving the world” with video documentation of how you did it…

I hope you find the time to listen to Mark’s video and then forward it to someone you love.

…

Freedom Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

End the Fed, yes, but End War First

3 Comments

“…we’re on an unsustainable fiscal path at the federal government level. That has been the case for some time. And it’s something we will have to deal with. And better to deal with it sooner rather than later.” — Fed Chairman Powell

Here’s one of the most powerful non-elected public figures in the world warning us that our elected officials are spending the next generations’ money at such a high rate that something bad will eventually happen if they don’t stop borrowing from future generations and start living within their own means, i.e. tax revenue.

US debt is unsustainable.

The answer for liberal minds is to raise the tax rates higher and higher. Old-school communists want it raised to 100%. But problems arising in complex systems are almost never solved with simple binary thinking. There’s good (if suppressed) evidence that a U-shaped dose-response curve exists for taxes in the US: when you raise tax rates from zero to some intermediate level, more and more money comes into the federal government, obviously. But when this intermediate tax rate is exceeded, the amount of tax money decreases. This is thought to be due to economic weakness brought about by diminished public spending and diminished income for businesses which causes job cuts, causing the public to further reduce its purchasing of goods and services as unemployment increases. This creates a negative feedback loop that can result in a recession or depression.

Conservatives tend to think that all taxes are theft and would be abolished in a perfect world (whatever that is). They tend to have a tough-minded attitude and think that poor people shouldn’t be financially coddled by the government because this creates “learned helplessness” and an inability to legally work without losing the money that the government is already giving them. The problem with this mindset is that , once again, problems arising within complex systems are almost never solved with simple binary thinking. Without appropriate central government oversight, corporations soon own and run the world, and we’re left with the corrupt “democracy” and manipulated financial markets we have today.

The superhuman ability to see both sides of political issues is essential to problem solving within the complex systems of government finance.

And since there are no superhumans among us (as far as we’re allowed to know), the only hope we have of solving our political and financial problems is democracy where both sides are allowed to speak out and eventually vote some sort of legal compromise between each extreme of our binary, flawed, short-sighted solutions.

In a superhumanly objective world, there could not be two political parties because everyone would agree on logical solutions. In a totalitarian world like the one being quietly imposed upon us now by the WEF in the US and Canada, one flawed viewpoint alone is allowed, the other flawed viewpoint becomes illegal… until enough people starve to death and hopefully those remaining become brave enough to demand democracy again.

But democracy must be true democracy, not the corrupt version we have now where big corporate money can elect and control the votes of politicians through campaign donations, promises of cushy jobs and lucrative speaking engagements when they leave office, and corporate threats of revealing each politician’s most illegal business dealings and ugliest personal secretes.

I agree with Powell that the current US fiscal spending spree is unsustainable. It’s only a matter of time until financial gravity brings the US mega-debt house of cards tumbling down, possibly catalyzed by the current global efforts to detach the US dollar from reserve currency status.

Some might honestly disagree, believing that a nation with the ability to create as much of the world’s reserve currency out of thin air as it pleases doesn’t need to obey the rules of gravity and logic that apply to the rest of the world. These people seem to think that although all other current and historical governments, all businesses, and all households must never borrow orders of magnitude more money than they can hope to pay back, the US government is under no such constraint. These folks are often academics who tend to be dethatched from what they call “the real world.” A significant number of them are also said to be openly communists who would like to see democracy and free markets replaced by an “enlightened” top-down communist system, hopefully “done the right way” for the first time in recorded history.

Unfortunately, these academics, although good people with altruistic motivations, hold such a strong grip on the political opinions of young educated people in the US that there may be no future for true democracy here. Some claim there is a connection between the woke movement and communism. If this is true, the traditional freedoms associated with the historical US will be voted out of existence because reason is useless against the woke mindset. It rejects logic, reason, and even the existence of an objective reality.

I get it. My own limited understanding of things leads me to strongly suspect that our universe is analogous to a holo-physical simulation. But as best I can tell, it’s a simulation that allows free will decisions and actions to result in positive as well as painfully negative outcomes, including starvation and death.

And if I’m right, the great thing about true democracy is that it encourages decisions and actions (laws) based upon compromises between the eternally opposing extremes of valid, but always fatally flawed opinions on both sides of any divide.

Even though I agree with Mr. Powell when he speaks the truth about US debt as he did today (quoted above), anyone can see the cracks in this gentleman’s well-rehearsed humble demeanor when he, an unelected official, tells congress exactly what they WILL DO, as if he were God speaking:

“I will just say this, this really can only end one way and that’s with congress raising the debt ceiling in a timely fashion so that the US can pay all of its bills when and as due. That’s what has to happen. And if that doesn’t happen, no one should think that the FED has the ability to shield the financial markets or the economy from the consequences of moving too slow. … As I said, this ends in only one way and that is congress voting to raise the debt ceiling so that the US can pay all of our bills.” — FED Chairman Powell

You might want to hear his tone for yourself as he speaks two contradicting messages, the one up top (against US Debt), the other just above that demands congress raise more debt NOW.

Is it just me, or does it sound to you like this man is quite accustomed to telling congress how to vote? (The arrogant more-debt-now quote starts at 54:28 on this video:)

As much as I appreciate the way Mr. Powell speaks in understandable human English unlike most of his predecessors, I think that a fiat currency that can be legally manipulated by an unelected official who believes that a constant 2% inflation rate is not theft from the poor and middle class but instead is somehow desirable… I think this selfish and cruel opinion, combined with the entire institution of the FED should be abandoned soon and relegated to a growing list of history’s failed human experiments.

I suspect that the FED will be dissolved when the World Economic Forum’s “reset” takes place, but the problem there is that the WEF hates true democracy with a violent passion and cannot tolerate any fatally flawed political opinions but its own.

The WEF plans to create global dominance for its elite “stakeholders,” and anyone who dares to oppose them will be jailed with assets seized, as we’ve been shown by the WEF graduates up north.

The selfish, narcissistic WEF mindset is so yesterday, so much the reincarnated spawn of the dead amoral “scientific” materialist cults of history that nobody should take them seriously, let alone vote them into power over the “free” world.

We all need to grow up and try to be more realistic, more inclusive, and entirely more loving than the WEF and its power-drunk grads.

Think about it: There’s no way that liberal minds could or should stop feeling deep empathy for the poor and acting upon these loving feelings. And there’s no way that conservatives could or should stop being tough-minded people who see “tough love” as a necessary part of living realistically in this world.

Both views are part of a spectrum, they’re not a binary phenomenon. But both extremes need a voice in government.

True democracy alone allows them both to speak and vote. Every other form of government that I’m aware of is totalitarian and takes one extreme, liberal or conservative (relative to the times), and rams it down everyone’s throats creating imbalance, suffering and death.

I agree with those who want to end the FED and never replace it. I agree with those who want to replace fiat currencies with something like Bitcoin or gold (but not a central bank digital currency, of course). Money should be impossible for a bank or a government to create out of thin air. When they do this, it’s theft via devaluation of the currency.

But if the young people of today vote for a “woke” totalitarian government run by wealthy WEF stakeholders, I just hope the “reset” is bloodless and happens in voting booths.

Because at this point in human history with the geomagnetic protection of Earth growing weaker and weaker as a prelude to the next pole flip, I think it’s more important than anything else for us all to stop killing each other. Stop all war cold-turkey.

If we finally become unwilling to kill each other and follow amoral leaders into war, who knows what could happen?

Maybe whomever operates those UFOs (that the Navy admits are real) will help us survive the next pole shift. I bet they might.

And after that we might want to create a screening process that keeps sociopaths out of government and offers them some sort of option for ethical or moral or perhaps even spiritual rehabilitation.

…

Democracy Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

Declassified Australian Government Documents on UFOs Deserve Everyone’s Attention

8 Comments

As I studied these previously classified UFO documents (second video below) that have now been released by the Australian Government, I kept wondering what in the world the motivation for secrecy has been over the years, and what keeps the lid on genuine UFO disclosure now.

As we know, the unpardonable sin in US society today is racism against people of color. Could this cultural reality have anything to do with the surprising resilience of UFO secrecy since 2017?

Most US citizens who reject the notion that UFOs are demonic would not likely be overwhelmed if an official US proclamation came from a US President saying that off-world beings are on Earth now, and the US has recovered several of their gravity-control vehicles powered by zero-point energy.

I think the public would forgive all the current enforcers of the UFO coverup if the media were telling us that years ago drastic measures (lies, threats, and violence) were deemed necessary by top authorities, all of whom have passed away now. The mainstream story would assure us that these weren’t evil villains, their secrecy scheme was designed and enforced to keep deadly technology away from US enemies and the world’s terrorists.

Those of us who know a little UFO history might be less forgiving, but most US citizens don’t waste their time reading conspiracy theories, even the verifiable ones. In fact most people born in the US don’t read much nonfiction at all, they’ve been subjected to forced “education” since first grade and think of reading as the pointless torture of the wonder years.

Of course, some wealthy folk would be ruined by UFO disclosure if free energy could be delivered to the public in anything like the way it appears to flow through UFOs. Being for-profit corporations, the oil industry as well as the fossil fuel dependent “clean” energy industries would have no choice but to do everything in their power to keep the lid on UFO craft retrievals. Bribes, campaign contributions to both sides, and the routine schemes designed to seduce and entrap elected officials would have to multiply. As Dr. Greer insists, energy corporations pose a logical roadblock to disclosure, assuming zero-point energy technology exists in “alien reproductions vehicles.”

Another possible explanation for the continuing UFO coverup would be that those in the know have discovered some strange and ugly truth. Perhaps something to the effect that humanity serves as lab rats to a group of aliens who are a hundred million years ahead of us in tech, but equal to us in immorality. Our beloved and fearless Linda Moulton Howe favors something similar to this theory. “We are containers,” I’ve heard her say. Materialists may interpret this to mean that we are containers for DNA. Idealists might say that the phrase means that our bodies are containers for consciousness or the soul. The most chilling aspect of this theory is that cruel “aliens” have a technology that can capture consciousness and transfer it to another container as they please. I’d prefer to think that our souls are in God’s hands, but if Musk is right about simulation theory, it’s difficult to be as dogmatic as most religious and anti-religious fundamentalists tend to be.

Considering the 13.8 billion years of history that mainstream science in teenage arrogance ascribes to the Universe, combined with the way we “civilized” humans of the 21st Century still torture and sacrifice laboratory animals, the “human cosmic lab rat” theory seems somewhat plausible, especially if you give any credence to the adage, “As above, so below.”

Hopefully, a truly advanced species would also be enlightened enough to enjoy a greater degree of moral and spiritual development than humans have so-far achieved at the species level.

Moving even further to the fringe, what if the most off-putting version of UFO origins is part of the genuine truth, namely that the US Air Force, NASA, and a break-away Nazi cult from within the CIA have been working through private defense and aerospace corporations for many decades to help literal Nazis (whose forefathers survived WWII) on their UFO retro-engineering program down south?

What if it’s true that a Nazi assistance program has been going on in underground facilities in the US, Antarctica, and Argentina since the first half of the 20th Century, prior to Admiral Byrd’s military expedition to Antarctica (in which he apparently suffered defeat and was forced to retreat to Argentina where he allegedly gave the newspapers a story of a technologically advanced foe capable of flying from pole to pole)?

It sounds far-fetched, partly because it’s viscerally repulsive and deflating. But listen to Jessie Roestenberg tell of her encounter with “beautiful blond people” in a UFO that was shaped like a “Mexican hat.” The film was broadcast by the BBC in 1977.

Her sighting happened in 1954, long after WWII was over, the Nazis were officially defeated, and their master-race nightmare was certifiably dead and buried. Jessie’s eye-witness account starts at 34:10 on this video, but some of the stuff before and after it is relevant and interesting.

If Jessie Roestenberg is lying, I’m an aardvark.

It’s interesting that she never made any Nazi connections to the blond beings she saw. And it’s possible that the blonds might have been genuine off-planet “aliens” in light of a newspaper report (linked here at 5:50 on a similar video) to the effect that Jessie said she began having ESP abilities after the encounter, a claim that has been sometimes associated with UFO sighting and often with Near Death Experiences.

The Nazis and things related to them feel inherently repulsive, but if we’re looking for a mega-motivation to keep UFO secrets, this could be a powerful one.

After WWII, it would have been career and political suicide for the military brass or any US president to publicly admit that Hitler’s scientists didn’t exactly lose the war…

“No, folks, the Nazis are alive and well. And incidentally, they trashed Admiral Byrd’s fleet last week with radical saucer technology straight out of a comic book.”

The US government leaders at the time would have kept this idea under wraps. It wouldn’t have been useful even to the CIA as misinformation designed to hide a truth.

That was then, but this is now. What’s keeping the US shadow government so tight-lipped today on UFOs?

Could it be that the same repulsive and dismissible conspiracy theory contains an element of truth: Unrepentant Nazis are still perfecting UFO technology while selectively breeding and genetically manipulating themselves in an effort to become “the master race”?

Imagine CNN, MSNBC and FOX “News” reporting (in word-for-word lockstep)…

“Yes folks, most of those abduction memories you’ve been having were Nazis from Antarctica trying to broaden their gene pool after a few too many decades of mating with uncles and cousins under the Antarctic ice. It seems their chins were getting too pointy, their faces too narrow, and autosomal recessive diseases too common, so they went sneaking out at night in triangular gravity propulsion vehicles to paralyze and mate with the rest of humanity. Rumor has it they were also getting tired of blond hair. Who knew that could happen?”

Even if it were true, I can’t imagine a report like this ever seeing the light of day. Maybe a hundred years from now, I guess.

The very term “tall blond aliens” doesn’t go over well in our increasingly woke society. For some people, all you have to do is be born white to be a racist for life, incapable of repentance and therefor undeserving of forgiveness. If that’s not racism, “then give me another word for it.”

So imagine you were a lifetime employee of the US shadow government, faced with the congressional challenge of coming clean about your part in hiding unrepentant white Nazi racists with advanced technology that you and your fellow cult members had helped perfect by diverting US taxpayer money into corporate CIA-Nazi unacknowledged black projects.

What would you do?

I’d change my name, move to a remote part of the world and hide. Life in prison or death by lethal injection would not be my first choice. I think it would be nearly impossible to survive in the US after admitting your involvement in the Antarctic Nazi-master-race scenario.

By contrast, admitting you had helped hide humanity’s cosmic-lab-rat status, or admitting you had illegally helped Big Energy keep its vice grip on power would be next to nothing.

And so I don’t know whether to be suspicious or thankful that nothing is mentioned of the alleged Nazis connection to UFOs in the recently released documents regarding the official Australian Government’s version of UFO history.

Here’s Jay at Project Unity reading through the documents. I really appreciate this guy. He probably knows that most US citizens hate to read, so he’s doing it for us.

I listened four times to the video below and still couldn’t get all the details into my tiny brain until I clicked the link below his YT video and read the things for myself.

Parts of the documents are like Cliffs Notes on a good UFO history book. Reading this would be an excellent place to start for anyone new to the UFO literature. It would move a person up the endless learning curve on a vast, widely neglected, and vitally important part of history, the undeniable existence of UFOs and the now undeniable US government coverup…

Jay didn’t read every word of the hand-written notes that accompany the parts he did read to us, so I recommend clicking on this link and checking out all the hand written messages because seeing them for yourself in context adds a bit of evidence of their authenticity, I think. Here’s the whole link if the above link doesn’t work.

https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&redir_token=QUFFLUhqbFNLSDlfanN0VU1RY2tVb0tlZ09ad2MyZ09IQXxBQ3Jtc0trN09sLV8ybnJJM29LZUhvekk4ajV1NzlUdEJQLVd6aG81Vlp2QjZKSllsenNkckVHbFdEZ2pvU0tYWVFVLS1OQy1pZmZVTzhmNnZiQy1GRlphVkVwWTg3dkVYdGd1d3NGQmNoMVcwWWFZOWNsRXdWZw&q=https%3A%2F%2Fdrive.google.com%2Ffile%2Fd%2F16DnMGVIBfANd89SYsKO39xvDvKy-oNQW%2Fview%3Fusp%3Dsharing&v=vZmxVd4DMOQ

And if that doesn’t work, go to Jay’s YouTube video on YouTube (not here) and click on the appropriate link that’s below the video and above the comment section, download the documents and view them on Adobe Acrobat or a browser.

Unless I’m mistaken, these documents represent a significant step forward in the overall UFO/UAP disclosure process, especially if they find their way into the hands of the US Congress (assuming they have time to read) and into the numb hands of our sleeping media giants. (Nothing but love for the vanishingly rare real journalists out there, like Ross Coulthart.)

In the US, the elites seem to want to pretend that UAPs began showing up in the early 2000’s. The Australian documents put this narrative to rest while making it more difficult for mercenary debunkers to convince the non-reading public that UFOs are birds, Venus, balloons, and hoaxes that must go back into the drawer with Mr. Hat.

Please send a link for the above two videos to your friends, whether they’re skeptics or UFO history readers.

…

History Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD