Science Meets Spirituality – The Near-death Experience

Three years ago I wrote a short story (Don’t Shoot Me in the Head) about a scientist who studied Near-death Experiences (NDEs). Little did I know, someone like my protagonist exists in the real world today and operates in the realm of published, peer-reviewed science.

Dr. Bruce Greyson, MD has spent a distinguished career studying and publishing his findings derived from thousands of people who have reported their own Near-death Experiences.

If any branch of science can move humanity forward in moral evolution, this is probably it.

Darwin enabled the divorce of science from spirituality by confusing epigenetic adaptation with what has become our current dogma of genetic macro-evolution. This honest mistake has probably caused more human suffering and genocide than all other major religions combined.

This is because, unlike the pseudoscientific faith known as “scientific materialism” that dominates modern science, most other major religions promote the golden rule.

Materialism promotes the myth of a mindless, meaningless, amoral Universe that operates randomly. To this religious pseudoscience, God is an “unnecessary concept,” to be denounced with censorship and the refusal to fund research that might cast doubt on their current dogma.

But now, science recognizes a source of evidence that casts credible doubt on the assumptions of “scientific” materialism. If allowed to continue, NDE research will increase humanity’s odds of survival by re-uniting science with the spiritual pursuit of moral, altruistic, and loving behavior.

Meet Dr. Greyson, an example of the rarest creature on Earth today, a genuine scientist…

Hearing people tell their NDE stories teaches us…

1. Consciousness really does appear to continue after death, at least for some individuals.

2. We all seem to be “one” in a way that centers around love.

3. The purpose of life appears to involve the golden rule, “woven into the fabric of the universe” — Treat others as if they were you. “It is not just a commandment that we should obey, it is an indisputable law of nature.

To me, this is the most useful implication of Dr. Greyson’s work and how it has affected him personally: By listening with an open mind as people tell their Near-death Experiences, we will gradually become unafraid of death and able to live fearlessly in altruism, compassion, and love.

Fearless Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

PS: I almost featured this video of Dr. Greyson giving a speech on his NDE research. Maybe I should have, it’s at least equally worth watching, if not more so.

Dr. Greyson has a website and a new book, After. He is also involved in a nonprofit organization, the IANDS, that “promotes research, education, and support around near-death experiences.” The IANDS mission is “to advance a global understanding” of NDE and related experiences. “We envision a future in which all people embrace near-death and related experiences as sources of meaning and inspiration for a better world.

I have no affiliation with IANDS, but suddenly wish I had done a psychiatry residency (instead of pathology) and gone into NDE research. Maybe next lifetime.

“The golden rule is of no use to you whatever unless you realize it’s your move.” – Frank Crane

9 thoughts on “Science Meets Spirituality – The Near-death Experience

  1. You’ve hit on another topic of interest. Near-death experience and life beyond have always fascinated me. I’ve read and listened to many stories in this area. I’ve been with several people on their death bed that talk to loved ones on the other side so I know there is life beyond this world. When you see people that are on the other side, you begin to lose your fear of death as know that we do live on in some form. Because of all your interesting explorations, I’m wanting more and more to start a paranormal blog. It’s been on my mind for several years now.

    • I think you really should start a paranormal blog, Gypsy Bev. I think the word paranormal exists for us only because we don’t know the hidden nature and extent of what is normal. If, for instance, we are living in a holodeck-style simulation, which I suspect is roughly the case, then the beings from outside our realm would be more real and more “normal” than we are, from a broader perspective. And God might be the most real and normal being alive, rather than a spirit with fewer physical senses than the beings he allows into this particular simulation.

      • We really have no idea what is normal. Like your explanation of other possibilities. I have a feeling that some of those that study us don’t feel we are normal at all. Of course, I would not like to be considered ‘normal.’

        • I know what you mean. “Normal” sounds kind of boring. I remember growing up in a family that seemed a wee bit eccentric, so when I was raising my family, one of my deepest hopes was to have a normal family. In retrospect, I think we came close thanks to my wife. She’s really the most normal person I’ve ever met, and I don’t mean she’s boring. Just even-keeled, even-tempered, honest, trustworthy, kind-hearted… sort of a “paranormal” person in those ways, I guess.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.