You're not going to believe this, man!

What Caused the Cambrian Explosion of Radical New DNA on Earth?

Leave a comment

The materialist’s search for an explanation of the Cambrian Explosion of life on Earth (as inferred from the geologic column) brings new insight on the constipation of thought in evolution science.

This is peer-reviewed stuff, so do, do, do hear me out.

As you may have heard here ad nauseum, “scientific” materialism demands that we stick our fingers in our ears, close our eyes and somehow come to “know” that God does not exist and therefore no intelligence of any sort could have created the original genetic codes of life on Earth or any such codes across the Cosmos.

Furthermore, materialism demands we “know” that NHI or “space aliens” could NOT have altered life’s codes on Earth or brought them to Earth from a distant planet because human theoretical physics has ruled out interstellar travel. The speed of light is too slow and yet nothing can go faster. Simple as that. It’s like a proof text in fundamentalist Christianity. Nothing is left for you to question. No God. No aliens. Just random, mindless forces. That’s the playing field if you want a career. The absence of conscious intelligence is nonnegotiable in materialist dogma. Imagine a mind, anyone’s mind, God’s, your own, or mine actually causing something undetermined, free, and new and you’ve broken the first rule of Fight Club.

But as with the proof texts “misinterpreted” by a Church you don’t belong to, where no amount of dogma can erase the questions they’ve raised, materialists are compelled from within to explain the sudden appearance of new, novel life forms during the narrow window of geologic time called the Cambrian Explosion.

Their latest theory is always worth reading, but this time they’ve taken mindlessness to the final frontier: Coprolite (the technical term for fossilized feces and petrified poop).

Mindless metabolic waste does the heavy lifting this week. And they’re serious.

After all, there’s lots of excrement in the fossil record during that big explosion of never-before-seen life forms. Plenty of poop afterwards, too. But there’s none at all before then. Primitive life didn’t poop. It was too simple. Then by chance simple digestive systems appeared and quickly became complex, creating a positive feedback poop-loop that became the most brilliant creative non-mind that Earth has ever seen, writing new DNA code at breakneck speed.

Paleontologists estimate that millions of species likely came into existence in this narrow zone of geologic time. The manure miracle produced novel species quicker than a science fiction writer on caffeine pills, all of it done by writing DNA code so complex that our AIs today are still trying to solve the translation problem.

According to Gemini, “Designing complex multicellular organisms (plants, animals, or multi-tissue species) remains a distant prospect. Doing so would require solving how genetic code translates into complex embryonic development, organogenesis, and neural architectures.”

Elon builds giant AI infrastructures while real creative power lurks in ancient ordure.

If you’re open to slang, here’s a link to the literal shit theory of evolution, published in a peer-reviewed science journal that Gemini insists “is consistently ranked as one of the highest-impact and most cited journals in the field of ecology and evolutionary biology.”

https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/abstract/S0169-5347(26)00156-4

Yes, folks, the fastest and widest expansion of complex life on Earth is now attributed to dung.

As long as we’re talking about replacing God with Guano, it’s probably worth hearing what one of the Intelligent Design scientists had to say:

“Given that (a) thousands of new genes must have arisen to generate the new animal forms that arise in the Cambrian explosion, (b) those new genes represent a huge amount of new genetic information, and (c) information comes from a mind, I think the real trigger behind the Cambrian explosion is something a lot more powerful than merely the presence of increased fecal matter in the ocean.”

Here’s a link to that article:

Paper Promotes “Weirdest Theory Yet” for the Cambrian Explosion

Unfortunately, the brave and beloved leaders of the UFO community tend to ignore most of the technical details surrounding the stigmatized but highly logical theory of life evolving by Intelligent Design.

To me, this is a mistake of real size because when you consider the numbers of other intelligently inhabited worlds that are widely believed by scientists to be out there somewhere in cosmic space, you’ve got to ask yourself: What are the odds that no one from those trillions and trillions of planets has figured out physics to a deeper level than we have?

Some of them have presumably been studying physics for billions of years while we’ve been studying it for a few hundred. And yet we’re to assume that everyone else in the Cosmos is stuck at the same dead end we’re supposedly stuck in now when it comes to quantum tunneling, warp drives, and flat-space wormholes. What are the odds of us being the most advanced in the Cosmos? Zero?

Remember the 4 minute mile barrier?

Remember how Nobel laureate Albert A. Michelson in 1894 said, “The more important fundamental laws and facts of physical science have all been discovered, and these are now so firmly established that the possibility of their ever being supplanted in consequence of new discoveries is exceedingly remote…Future discoveries must be looked for in the sixth place of decimals.”

We all want to deny the possibility of things we haven’t yet seen. But why? Reality is not limited by our lack of ability to detect it, agree with it, or predict it. To assume otherwise is “scientific” materialism, which is an anti-scientific, anti-spiritual, and anti-love force for humanity.

Anti-love, yes, because love requires free will (the ability to choose to love someone or to not love them), and free will is not allowed in materialism… unless you smuggle in a definition of free will that gives it the opposite of it’s original meaning. They actually do this, you know.

If the aliens travel among the star systems, is it likely they’ve never discovered Earth and have never been tempted to tamper with our DNA?

“I shouldn’t think so,” British accent.

This is why the Intelligent Design community ought to be talking to the UFO community. But it’s difficult because most of the ID folks are Christians, and many among the highly influential scientific part of the UFO community are anti-spiritual.

It shouldn’t be this way because truth remains unaffected by dogma or denial. Truth, in this sense, is stranger than science fiction because it does NOT have any tendency to change its story so it will sound more believable. Time is distorted by gravity? Yes. People have near-death experiences that change them? Yes. The moon is exactly the right distance from the sun for its size to make total eclipses possible? Yes. The cosmological constants are “fine-tuned” for life? Yes. Chromosomes normally determine a person’s physical gender? Yes. Light waves reach you at the same speed whether you’re going toward the light or away from it? Yes. The cosmos is expanding and the expansion is accelerating? Yes, scientists claim to have confirmed even this logical impossibility by experimentation. They say dark energy is responsible. What if they had used the term “demon energy” instead? Would it be any more difficult to believe?

I’m a non-fundamentalist, non-dogmatic Christian who appreciates the logical scientific work of the Intelligent Design community, and I’m also a scientist (retired pathologist) who follows and believes the UFO community’s heroic whistleblowers who have given up everything except their integrity and unwavering love for humanity.

Intelligent Design and Ufology are not oil and water. Part of their mutual repulsion is that each side doesn’t want to take on the emotional browbeating that the other side receives from the narrow-minded, angry materialists.

Nevertheless, truth will break through eventually no matter who opposes it, and once UFO disclosure arrives undiluted into the worldviews of the public, the ontological shock will shake human dogmas on both sides of the spiritual and anti-spiritual divide.

We would be wise to prepare for a future that upsets our cherished worldviews. Preparation begins with everyone learning to feel less dogmatic about the things we “know” to be true of the cosmos, the nature of evolution, and the place that conscious intelligence occupies within and beyond our limited understanding of cosmic space-time.

For example, if your view of the Cosmos excludes God, then any vastly superior intelligence from another planet can show itself to you and the public and can inform you that within the Cosmos there is/are other non-human being(s) of greater intelligence, greater technology, and more power than the one(s) you’ve already met. And one of those higher ones will necessarily have become the single most powerful NHI in the Cosmos. That’s how natural selection works. Suddenly you will realize that this being or beings is the natural god of scientific materialist philosophy, a dogma that claims to “know” that nothing exists beyond the cosmos. Finding yourself at this philosophical level of “enlightenment,” you may discover that you’re not alone: you might join the Christian denominations that already believe that God is a being who exists entirely within the Cosmos, Heaven is a planet, there’s nothing beyond, and our Cosmos is literally the Universe (all that there is anywhere is here with nothing beyond).

And if your view of God exists only because you “know” that the Bible is infallible and inerrant (has no significant errors about God’s character or anything else when interpreted as your church prescribes), then you’re in a vulnerable situation. When the folk from another planet show up here and convince you that the history of Earth is significantly different from what you’ve read in the Good Book, you will be at risk of losing the greatest gift ever given to humanity: a personal relationship with the totally loving God, the Supreme Being revealed in some of the passages of the New Testament ascribed to Jesus of Nazareth.

…

Cambrian love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

Nasty Data on COVID Origins

10 Comments

Ivor Cummins is the genius engineer who uses his expertise in complex systems analysis to save lives by advocating coronary artery calcium scans while he educates the brain-dead portion of mainstream medicine on the science of type 2 diabetes, myocardial infarction (heart attack), and obesity.

Here is Ivor’s YouTube channel and here is his podcast. This man is well worth your time if the mainstream “news” emanating from the outlets on both sides of the political spectrum ever begins to sound dubious to you.

In the video below, Ivor Cummins and Gabor Erdosi go over the scientific data surrounding the question of whether the virus behind COVID-19 came from a laboratory rather than from nature.

Of course, focusing on this data is taboo at Google/YouTube and FaRcebook, so the video below may be deleted before you watch it. If so, you’ll find the audio here on Ivor’s podcast, episode # 110 (Ep110).

Quoting the video’s comment section…

“Fortunately the Truth checkers at Gutube can’t understand [what] these chaps are saying.”

Yes, the discussion is, at times, obscured by technical language, but please hang in for the best part, the evidence that the COVID-19 virus has spent significant time inside a specific lineage of laboratory mouse. (All other lab mice, we’re told, are invulnerable to COVID-19 and cannot be infected by it.)

I found limited information on Gabor Erdosi. He apparently has a Master of Molecular Biology degree, a background in genetics, and is touted as “King of Root-Cause investigation” in the context of genetics. I wish I knew more about him.

 

  1. Although these data indicate conclusively (to me) that the COVID-19 virus (SARS-CoV-2) was produced in a laboratory, one cannot be sure that the virus was made in China. There are other possibilities. For instance, the Wuhan lab in China might have been “framed,” set up by a foreign country to look guilty and take the blame for the pandemic. Who knows? You and I don’t. If one accepts the currently untestable assumption that the virus did come from China, then there would still be uncertainty as to whether the bug escaped the lab accidentally or deliberately. (Of course, why any morally sane individual(s) would concoct this virus in the first place is beyond me.)
  2. The math applied in this video to cast colossal doubt on the possibility that all these rare mutations came from random processes (outside of a lab) can also be used to show the flaw in thinking that random mutations in nature can conceivably generate complex biological systems, that is in a Universe that’s only 13.8 billion years old. (Don’t get angry now. Relax, read Stephen Meyer’s, Signature in the Cell, enjoy the math and draw your own private conclusions. Maybe the Universe is infinitely old, unlimited in volume, or accompanied by an infinite number of “parallel universes.” Any of these options would allow all seemingly impossible chains of interacting natural random coincidence to become reality… but not just neo-Darwinian evolution, also we would have to include the existence of a benevolent being or beings whom we might logically deem worthy of the title, God(s).
  3. Even if everyone decides that the Chinese Communist Party is behind the pandemic, we would be foolish to allow ourselves to hate China or to seek revenge. Without hating anyone, humanity must stop following leaders with limited conscience (sociopaths).  We must rise above hatred and violence or we’ll soon conspire together to bring our species down into the fossil record with countless other extinct species. With all the WMD technology today, including pandemics, our options have shrunken: love each other or die fighting. “Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” It’s too late for hate.

Geek Love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

I thought this one was a hoax

18 Comments

When viral reports began circulating a week or two ago about Haim Eshed, the 87 year-old former head of Israel’s Defense Ministry’s space directorate, I suspected it was all a hoax. And not a clever one.

I didn’t rush to Snopes because Snopes is not even in the ballpark of unbiased information. Like Wikipedia, they carry water for the mainstream, denying anything that casts doubt on the infallibility of your TV set.

But just now I happen to click on Snopes feeble attempt at debunking Haim Eshed’s statements and realized a few surprising things:

1. The man exists.

2. Haim Eshed truly was the head of the Israelis Defense Ministry’s “space directorate” for 30 years.

3. He really does have a book coming out, “The Universe Beyond the Horizon — Conversations with Professor Haim Eshed.” (I still can’t find it. Please let me know if you know where I can buy a copy in English.)

4. As far as Snopes has been able to determine, Haim Eshed really did make claims that humans have made contact with aliens, there are underground bases on Mars, and unnamed officials in the United States have signed “an agreement with the aliens.”

5. This story really did appear in an Israeli newspaper, “Yediot Aharonot” (The Jerusalem Post) and was commented upon by that newspaper on Facebook on December 4. Snopes says this Facebook quote is real:

“The UFOs have asked not to publish that they are here, humanity is not ready yet. Trump was on the verge of finding out, but the aliens in the Galactic Federation say: Wait, let the winds calm down first. They do not want mass hysteria to develop in us. They want to make us sane first and understand. They have waited until today, for humanity to evolve and reach a stage where we will generally understand what space and spaceship are.”

I should mention that the geniuses at Snopes begin their objective debunking with this photograph:

How could anyone take Snopes seriously when they feel free to “poison the well” with humerus ridicule? Do they think this sets the stage for their superior objectivity and intellect?

Giggling about UFOs shows a level of bias that’s outdated since official “disclosure” began in 2017. Snopes’ apparent ignorance should cause them embarrassment.

In their “real world” report, Snopes reminds us that NASA is still looking for extraterrestrial life. Finding this relevant would require the naïve assumption that NASA is honest. More likely, NASA pretends that UFOs don’t exist because they will lose funding the moment the folks operating the UFOs are identified.

Limiting the scope of scientific exploration through biased funding is the rule in science, not the exception. This is true in all branches of mainstream science from medicine to space weather.

Trying an appeal to authority, Snopes makes this statement, “It should also be noted that these claims [of Haim Eshed] do not have the support of the scientific community.”

That’s changing. The United States government has admitted to the public that UFOs are real. The DOD claims the aerial phenomena are enigmatic.

And here’s a scientist, Dr. Michael P. Masters (a professor of biological anthropology specializing in human evolutionary anatomy, archaeology, and biomedicine) who has now published a science-based book on his astonishing interpretation of UFOs.

That’s the good professor selling t-shirts in the featured image above. He’s not in the same league with Haim Eshed, in my limited view of things, but I greatly respect his courage and honesty.

Optimistically, it may not be long before the US government funds mainstream science in the study of unidentified flying objects and other unidentified aerial phenomena.

The part of the statement by the 87 year-old Haim Eshed that I find particularly interesting is the alleged opinion of the aliens that humans need to “understand what space and spaceship are.” This implies there may be something profound about these simple concepts…

What is space?

At the moment, I suspect space is like a three-dimensional computer monitor made of small Planck-sized 3-D pixels which are intelligently controlled from beyond our space-time Universe. This might provide an answer to the question, “What medium exists to propagate light waves?” I doubt it’s “ether.” More likely it’s a medium capable of responding to information transmitted to it, like a 3-D monitor (conceptually like the holodeck of Star Trek).

What is a spaceship?

I suspect the answers to this lies on a continuum. Some spaceships are likely 3-D pieces of technology from hidden sources on Earth or other planets within the Universe. Other “spaceships” are likely advanced hologram technology owned and kept secret by the US Air Force who enjoys annoying the Navy with their new toys. Other “spaceships” may conceivably originate with the being(s) (possibly God or gods) who control the information flow into the 3-D pixels of our space-time “Universe” or simulation. Also, it’s possible that whatever reality undergirds the apparent phenomena of visualized ghosts and the like might also produce “spaceships.” (What am I forgetting here?)

Fine. Now we get it, Aliens. Can we please have some real disclosure for Christmas? We promise not to panic.

Love in 3-D alien pixels,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

Uncensored Science: Life and the Universe are Electromagnetic and Nonrandom

Leave a comment

The Safire Plasma Reactor will become a source of clean energy if the petroleum industry doesn’t shut them down soon. It may be too late. Word is getting out…

“All knowledge of reality starts from experience and ends in it…. 

“Propositions arrived at by purely logical means are completely empty as regards reality…

“Because Galileo saw this, and particularly because he drummed it into the scientific world, he is the father of modern physics — indeed, of modern science altogether.

“To him [her] who is a discoverer in this field [theoretical physics], the products of his imagination appear so necessary and natural that he regards them, and would like to have them regarded by others, not as creations of thought but as given realities.”

— Albert Einstein, “On the Methods of Theoretical Physics”  The Herbert Spencer lecture, Oxford, June 10, 1933.

“We’re not trying to trap high-energy photons and electrons comparable to the Sun’s photosphere — but it [the Safire plasma engine apparatus] does … We’re just trying to replicate what we think nature may be doing.

“Uniformitarianism is the idea that gradual changes over billions of years is [sic] the cause of all the effects that we see. It became philosophical theory, but not scientific fact.

“Charles Darwin, Charles Lyell, James Hutton, Thomas Huxley, Karl Marx and other historical characters held to the view of ‘Uniformitarianism.’ And it is Uniformitarianism that lays at the heart of much of modern science… that gradual changes over long periods of time is [sic] the primary factor of evolutionary development.

“It is Uniformitarianism that lays at the heart of the Big Bang theory which claims gravity is the primal driver of the universe. So the problem that you have is that none of these things are testable. The process of evolution is lacking sufficient factors to test.

“On the other hand, there are those who hold to the view that intelligence is the genesis of creation.

“Neither has anything to do with empirical science, and as a matter of fact, to claim either is science corrupts science.” — Montgomery Childs

I couldn’t agree more!

“I think that modern cosmology took an unfortunate turn several hundred years ago by denying or ignoring the question of function or purpose in the larger Cosmos. Biologists recognize the principle that form follows function so why do astrophysicists not recognize this principle? Why are astrophysicists not asking this question? The idea that life or intelligence would be attached to a planet or a star was too much for our consciousness so we denied its possibility. There was never any evidence to substantiate that denial…. Denying that a star could be alive is a misuse of the scientific method.” — Michael Clarage…

And so as a scientist, I think mainstream macro-evolutionary theory and intelligent design theory should show one another some respect. One side should not censor the other from kindergarten to the university system…

 

Love and empirical respect,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

PS: Sorry for posting too many videos, but each one is worth watching. The third (the one by Michael Clarage) seems especially profound to me.

Love, Lies and Opposable Thumbs

52 Comments

I wrote this in a comment:

“Love is impossible without trust. Trust has been undermined by the popular notion that honesty is optional. Honesty is impossible in a paradigm where there is no right and wrong, only amoral species competing for survival with no advantage attributed to honesty. We need to figure out who we are and why our survival depends on honesty, trust and love.”

What I meant was…

We’ve been sold snake-oil science: The notion that we’re nothing but animals with big brains living in a mindless, meaningless Universe.

This belief is death to a species capable of destroying worlds, because it will promote dishonesty which leads to distrust which leads to hatred and ultimately to self-annihilation via H-bombs, predatory genetic engineering or destruction of our own ecosystem through carelessness and toxic waste.

Everything we read is baptized in the “scientific” dogma that a mindless thing called “random DNA mutation” under the influence of “natural selection” or “survival of the fittest” literally writes our hypercomplex DNA codes, the complexity of which we’re only now beginning to catch a mind-boggling glimpse of.

Evolution is taught equally to children and doctors as “infallible” truth, rather than what it is: an uncontrolled, unblinded, non-randomized and speculative interpretation of weak retrospective data that hasn’t been given a thorough statistical analysis because it’s impossible to do so on retrospective, quasi-historic “data.” This is the very sort of weak study design that medical journals would reject as dangerous – if anyone were so naive as to submit such a study to a medical journal, which I can’t possibly imagine nowadays. Maybe in the 1950’s when a political committee voted the “food pyramid” into the scientific arena where it’s done nothing but damage to American health.

Almost everyone believes the evolutionary speculative tale unless they’re part of a fundamentalist religious group with other beliefs.

But either way, our species is heading for extinction because we have made it “normal” to lie to each other.

In commercials, only the sales stats matter, not the truth.

In our courts, the act of winning trumps integrity by virtue of the foundational assumption that there’s a difference between “legal justice” and “moral justice,” and the law, like “settled science” has no moral responsibility.

In politics, winning means infinitely more than honesty because the other side is so clearly evil, dumb and dangerous, no matter which side you’re on. Both sides are saving the world, so the end seems to justify the means, and lying appear to be a useful skill rather than the destructive force that logic would call it if we listened.

In our personal lives our circle of empathy narrows, justifying lies to those outside of it.

In the back of our minds we allow lies because we’re told from kindergarten that we’re just animals with big brains trying to survive. Animals tell lies with their body language and built in camouflage. We lie with our tongues. Other than that, we’re the same, right down to the DNA that was mindlessly coded for us.

And since we lie, we forget how to trust and how to remain steadfastly trustworthy come what may.

When we lose the capacity for trust, we lose the capacity for love. You can’t really love people you distrust. You can’t even know who they are, deep down.

With love off the table, we expand our acceptance of hatred, grudge holding and revenge. We thirst for personal victimhood and someone to blame, while ironically, predators become our heroes.

If we didn’t have opposable thumbs and weren’t able to blow humanity into tiny bits with a small fraction of our nuclear arsenal, it wouldn’t be such a big deal. We could blend with the deceitful but balanced ecosystems of animal behavior that dominate this planet. Camo is in their DNA. Sneaking, hiding and devouring prey are on page one of Earth’s user manual.

That’s what’s so confusing to us.

If we were only ten orders of magnitude stupider, we could survive, living as the hairless apes of soft science’s favorite fairytale.

But we’re too clever with the technology of killing. So the fading of honesty, trust and love are preparing us to push the button on ourselves. Look at Russia. This is not religious talk. This is secular logic that refuses to swallow neo-Darwinism and materialism without chewing.

In order to survive, our species needs to push all cultures toward honesty. Big brains self-destruct without it.

Honesty will resurrect trust and trustworthiness, setting the stage for love, logic and reason… and a rational treatment of sociopathic predators who need enlightened mental health care rather than election to congress.

…

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

…

Next time you’re writing emails, if you think of it, please tell a cherished friend about my blog (www.storiform.com). Thanks! I appreciate your thoughtfulness and help. Someday I’m going to put those little buttons in here to help poor Mr. Zuckerberg make some money.