You're not going to believe this, man!

What Caused the Cambrian Explosion of Radical New DNA on Earth?

Leave a comment

The materialist’s search for an explanation of the Cambrian Explosion of life on Earth (as inferred from the geologic column) brings new insight on the constipation of thought in evolution science.

This is peer-reviewed stuff, so do, do, do hear me out.

As you may have heard here ad nauseum, “scientific” materialism demands that we stick our fingers in our ears, close our eyes and somehow come to “know” that God does not exist and therefore no intelligence of any sort could have created the original genetic codes of life on Earth or any such codes across the Cosmos.

Furthermore, materialism demands we “know” that NHI or “space aliens” could NOT have altered life’s codes on Earth or brought them to Earth from a distant planet because human theoretical physics has ruled out interstellar travel. The speed of light is too slow and yet nothing can go faster. Simple as that. It’s like a proof text in fundamentalist Christianity. Nothing is left for you to question. No God. No aliens. Just random, mindless forces. That’s the playing field if you want a career. The absence of conscious intelligence is nonnegotiable in materialist dogma. Imagine a mind, anyone’s mind, God’s, your own, or mine actually causing something undetermined, free, and new and you’ve broken the first rule of Fight Club.

But as with the proof texts “misinterpreted” by a Church you don’t belong to, where no amount of dogma can erase the questions they’ve raised, materialists are compelled from within to explain the sudden appearance of new, novel life forms during the narrow window of geologic time called the Cambrian Explosion.

Their latest theory is always worth reading, but this time they’ve taken mindlessness to the final frontier: Coprolite (the technical term for fossilized feces and petrified poop).

Mindless metabolic waste does the heavy lifting this week. And they’re serious.

After all, there’s lots of excrement in the fossil record during that big explosion of never-before-seen life forms. Plenty of poop afterwards, too. But there’s none at all before then. Primitive life didn’t poop. It was too simple. Then by chance simple digestive systems appeared and quickly became complex, creating a positive feedback poop-loop that became the most brilliant creative non-mind that Earth has ever seen, writing new DNA code at breakneck speed.

Paleontologists estimate that millions of species likely came into existence in this narrow zone of geologic time. The manure miracle produced novel species quicker than a science fiction writer on caffeine pills, all of it done by writing DNA code so complex that our AIs today are still trying to solve the translation problem.

According to Gemini, “Designing complex multicellular organisms (plants, animals, or multi-tissue species) remains a distant prospect. Doing so would require solving how genetic code translates into complex embryonic development, organogenesis, and neural architectures.”

Elon builds giant AI infrastructures while real creative power lurks in ancient ordure.

If you’re open to slang, here’s a link to the literal shit theory of evolution, published in a peer-reviewed science journal that Gemini insists “is consistently ranked as one of the highest-impact and most cited journals in the field of ecology and evolutionary biology.”

https://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/abstract/S0169-5347(26)00156-4

Yes, folks, the fastest and widest expansion of complex life on Earth is now attributed to dung.

As long as we’re talking about replacing God with Guano, it’s probably worth hearing what one of the Intelligent Design scientists had to say:

“Given that (a) thousands of new genes must have arisen to generate the new animal forms that arise in the Cambrian explosion, (b) those new genes represent a huge amount of new genetic information, and (c) information comes from a mind, I think the real trigger behind the Cambrian explosion is something a lot more powerful than merely the presence of increased fecal matter in the ocean.”

Here’s a link to that article:

Paper Promotes “Weirdest Theory Yet” for the Cambrian Explosion

Unfortunately, the brave and beloved leaders of the UFO community tend to ignore most of the technical details surrounding the stigmatized but highly logical theory of life evolving by Intelligent Design.

To me, this is a mistake of real size because when you consider the numbers of other intelligently inhabited worlds that are widely believed by scientists to be out there somewhere in cosmic space, you’ve got to ask yourself: What are the odds that no one from those trillions and trillions of planets has figured out physics to a deeper level than we have?

Some of them have presumably been studying physics for billions of years while we’ve been studying it for a few hundred. And yet we’re to assume that everyone else in the Cosmos is stuck at the same dead end we’re supposedly stuck in now when it comes to quantum tunneling, warp drives, and flat-space wormholes. What are the odds of us being the most advanced in the Cosmos? Zero?

Remember the 4 minute mile barrier?

Remember how Nobel laureate Albert A. Michelson in 1894 said, “The more important fundamental laws and facts of physical science have all been discovered, and these are now so firmly established that the possibility of their ever being supplanted in consequence of new discoveries is exceedingly remote…Future discoveries must be looked for in the sixth place of decimals.”

We all want to deny the possibility of things we haven’t yet seen. But why? Reality is not limited by our lack of ability to detect it, agree with it, or predict it. To assume otherwise is “scientific” materialism, which is an anti-scientific, anti-spiritual, and anti-love force for humanity.

Anti-love, yes, because love requires free will (the ability to choose to love someone or to not love them), and free will is not allowed in materialism… unless you smuggle in a definition of free will that gives it the opposite of it’s original meaning. They actually do this, you know.

If the aliens travel among the star systems, is it likely they’ve never discovered Earth and have never been tempted to tamper with our DNA?

“I shouldn’t think so,” British accent.

This is why the Intelligent Design community ought to be talking to the UFO community. But it’s difficult because most of the ID folks are Christians, and many among the highly influential scientific part of the UFO community are anti-spiritual.

It shouldn’t be this way because truth remains unaffected by dogma or denial. Truth, in this sense, is stranger than science fiction because it does NOT have any tendency to change its story so it will sound more believable. Time is distorted by gravity? Yes. People have near-death experiences that change them? Yes. The moon is exactly the right distance from the sun for its size to make total eclipses possible? Yes. The cosmological constants are “fine-tuned” for life? Yes. Chromosomes normally determine a person’s physical gender? Yes. Light waves reach you at the same speed whether you’re going toward the light or away from it? Yes. The cosmos is expanding and the expansion is accelerating? Yes, scientists claim to have confirmed even this logical impossibility by experimentation. They say dark energy is responsible. What if they had used the term “demon energy” instead? Would it be any more difficult to believe?

I’m a non-fundamentalist, non-dogmatic Christian who appreciates the logical scientific work of the Intelligent Design community, and I’m also a scientist (retired pathologist) who follows and believes the UFO community’s heroic whistleblowers who have given up everything except their integrity and unwavering love for humanity.

Intelligent Design and Ufology are not oil and water. Part of their mutual repulsion is that each side doesn’t want to take on the emotional browbeating that the other side receives from the narrow-minded, angry materialists.

Nevertheless, truth will break through eventually no matter who opposes it, and once UFO disclosure arrives undiluted into the worldviews of the public, the ontological shock will shake human dogmas on both sides of the spiritual and anti-spiritual divide.

We would be wise to prepare for a future that upsets our cherished worldviews. Preparation begins with everyone learning to feel less dogmatic about the things we “know” to be true of the cosmos, the nature of evolution, and the place that conscious intelligence occupies within and beyond our limited understanding of cosmic space-time.

For example, if your view of the Cosmos excludes God, then any vastly superior intelligence from another planet can show itself to you and the public and can inform you that within the Cosmos there is/are other non-human being(s) of greater intelligence, greater technology, and more power than the one(s) you’ve already met. And one of those higher ones will necessarily have become the single most powerful NHI in the Cosmos. That’s how natural selection works. Suddenly you will realize that this being or beings is the natural god of scientific materialist philosophy, a dogma that claims to “know” that nothing exists beyond the cosmos. Finding yourself at this philosophical level of “enlightenment,” you may discover that you’re not alone: you might join the Christian denominations that already believe that God is a being who exists entirely within the Cosmos, Heaven is a planet, there’s nothing beyond, and our Cosmos is literally the Universe (all that there is anywhere is here with nothing beyond).

And if your view of God exists only because you “know” that the Bible is infallible and inerrant (has no significant errors about God’s character or anything else when interpreted as your church prescribes), then you’re in a vulnerable situation. When the folk from another planet show up here and convince you that the history of Earth is significantly different from what you’ve read in the Good Book, you will be at risk of losing the greatest gift ever given to humanity: a personal relationship with the totally loving God, the Supreme Being revealed in some of the passages of the New Testament ascribed to Jesus of Nazareth.

…

Cambrian love,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

“It’s the difficult Relationships that Force us to Grow,” Like functional Medicine Doctors and Space Aliens

3 Comments

Imagine you’re a brilliant mainstream medical doctor and someone who claims to be clairvoyant comes into your house with a Native American sage smudge stick to clear out the “heaviness” in the bedroom of your daughter who is having trouble sleeping.

This is the strangest part of a story of healing that Cynthia Li, MD reveals in this fascinating video interview filled with hard-won knowledge about regaining her lost health through functional medicine and her struggle to see beyond traditional medical education.

Please start listening at 3:21 to avoid the interviewer’s early summation which, to me, takes some of the thrill out of Dr. Li’s remarkable and enlightening story.

Yes, it’s possible for a brilliant, successful practicing MD to become one of those difficult “hypochondriac” patients with generalized weakness, aches and pains, depression, autoimmune disease of the thyroid, chronic non-specific GI problems, lack of libido, all the while testing normal on routine lab work done by numerous mainstream physicians.

These “supratentorial” patients were considered nuts until the recent explosion of new laboratory test met with functional medicine’s integration of the body’s systems. Now a few MD’s are starting to get it.

But still, MD’s have their fiercely protected specialties and subspecialties that force them to treat the body’s many systems as if they were separate, isolated body parts rather than the integrated parts of a hypercomplex whole. This integration was recognized in basic med school pathology textbooks like Robbins over 20 years ago.

Compartmentalization also holds back the US intelligence communities. The US government is a hypercomplex organism with many sentient systems that each believe they are independent of the others and in some cases, in competition, (like the FBI, CIA and DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency) or the Naval Air Defense and the United States Air Force).

The US government also has a parasite that, like the Cymothoa exigua, (a fish parasite that eats the tongue and replaces it in some species) has nearly replaced the US government’s “tongue” and sucks up an increasing portion of GDP (your hard work), probably by controlling the FED, the mainstream media, and public education.

Now imagine you’re a hard core materialist scientist who “knows” that UFOs can’t possibly have traveled “here from there.” You work in the Department of Defense with a religious fundamentalist who “knows” that UFOs are demonic and must not be studied. (This is said to be the actual situation in the DIA.)

The US government puts you and your co-worker in charge of writing the sanitized-for-the-public version of the recently rushed UFO/UAP internal investigation that congress demanded. (<–That’s a link to the report, by the way.) And below are the highpoints of the report…

You have 144 UFO cases (from 2004 to 2020)

143 of them “remain unexplained”

80 were recorded on multiple sensors

“Most” of them actually interrupted military activity

18 of them showed one or more of the following:

A. “unusual movement patterns or flight characteristics” (which we already know include almost-instant acceleration to velocities many times the speed of sound with no sonic boom, a feature carelessly attributed in the report to the speculative existence of a UFO/UAP “signature management” system rather than to the UFO’s likely use of novel physics)

B. turning at sharp angles at high speeds that produce g-forces that we’re told would kill a human being (reported as “unusual movements”)

C. moving “without discernable means of propulsion” (which the public has been told means defying the “known” laws of physics

D. jamming radar and other radio-frequency instruments of observers in jets and elsewhere (buried subtly in the report as “radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings”).

Eleven (11) “reports of documented instances in which pilots reported near misses with a UAP.”

One (1) was a weather balloon included in the report as an inside joke to the Cabal about Roswell, I suspect. But here’s the late Astronaut Edgar Mitchell, God rest his soul, the only PhD to have walked on the Moon, still getting the last laugh on Roswell…

So pretend you’re that totally biased government person working for the Cabal as a low level pawn, and you “know” UFOs can’t come from outer space, just as you “know” your religious co-worker who thinks they’re demonic must be crazier than the blue-alien people of the UFO community…

Would you pad your report with an emphasis on how weak, faulty and untrustworthy military observations are since their billion-dollar “sensors are not generally suited for identifying UAP”? As if no one ever thought to design fighter jets with the best equipment for figuring out what’s flying through the air in every battle condition, plus they forgot to train the pilots to discriminate one type of craft from another by carefully observing the subtlest of differences in order to gain an advantage in battle.

With the data in hand, would you begin your sanitized report with the following speculation, unsupported by evidence: “some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies.” Are we talking about the 143 unknowns or is this another overarching armchair assumption based on a biased gut feeling rather than specific evidence derived from the case reports?

You and your coworker have seen all of the public and classified videos and eye-witness testimonies of Navy fighter pilot Commander David Fravor, his Weapon Systems Officer, the pilot and WSO of the adjacent jet who saw the same things and gave their classified testimonies. Then you went over the records and testimonies of the crew(s) of the second flight of jet(s) that took off (after Fravor landed), and came back with the famous gun camera “tic-tac” video that the Navy has said represents a real UFO/UAP. Knowing all the public details and also the classified reports, would you put the following paragraph near the front of your report?

“In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis.” Wait, “observer misperception?” How do you spell, gaslighting? David Fravor, you deserve infinitely better respect that this. Whoever wrote this nonsense owes you a public apology and/or a public debate.

And then would you burry the following sentence deeper in the report, beyond the point where our mainstream zombie-woke “reporters” are likely to have time to read before the “news” deadline?

“After carefully considering this information, the UAPTF focused on [UFO] reports that involved UAP largely witnessed firsthand by military aviators and that were collected from systems we considered to be reliable.” Wait now, I thought you said the observers and their equipment were unreliable. Which is it?

Would you waste several paragraphs describing five theoretical classifications, only one of which contains 143 of the 144 cases?

Would you name the one and only relevant classification, “other,” omitting the elephant in the room, the possibility that UFOs come from extra-terrestrials or have some other “not-made-on-this-Earth” origin?

Would you give the US tax payers virtually no details on the most well-documented and interesting of the 143 “unexplained” UFO/UAP cases? Maybe one unclassified photo or telling detail for the folks paying your salary?

Would you avoid mentioning any of the thousands of UFO documents released begrudgingly under the Freedom of Information Act?

OK, regular people like you and me are not arrogant and untouchable enough to dismiss a congressional mandate and put out this intellectually insulting report, but someone on the inside is.

The question becomes, what government group is so untouchable they would dare write this biased propaganda? And what can we say about their motivation?

In my view, the report was probably written under the thumb of a “shadow government,” Cabal, or whatever term you would use to describe the parasites inside the US Government. They are probably unelected individuals for the most part, extremely wealthy with tentacles of control stretching down into the lives of various key career government workers at all levels, especially near the top.

Their motivation?

The Cabal is probably divided in their feelings about disclosure of alien life on Earth, some favoring it, others hating the idea and fearing the legal repercussions they would face if the public found out about this small part of their unconstitutional activity.

If they’re sitting on some horrible secret truth that would make most people wish we were never born and never had kids, then I understand and can even respect where the Cabal is coming from in treating us like morons with this report. Incidentally, the UFO community ignores this possibility to about the same extent that Hollywood focuses upon it. It’s a bit strange how we all have interlocking, complimentary blind spots. Maybe that’s why the political left and the political right need each other desperately if democracy wants to survive.

But what sort of terrible truths could be this bad?

It might be a choice between the lessor of two evils, something like this…

The greater evil: revealing the horrible truth that Earth is laboratory planet that’s about to be annihilated by a solar micronova.

The lesser evil: withholding a UFO-derived energy source that’s presumably renewable, clean, and dirt cheap. (The wealthy Cabal’s objectivity would likely be compromised by owning stock and/or mutual fund shares in the fossil fuel industry.)

But we could speculate until the cows come home and never guess right.

So I think the only thing we can conclude with certainty from this sanitized government UFO/UAP report is that some group with a great deal of power, whether legitimate or not, believes that disclosure of UFO origins would be worse than non-disclosure. They’ve tipped their hand and clearly intend to stall by issuing the most anti-alien biased, fact-deficient reports they possibly can.

There’s a parallel between the shadow government’s handling of UFO reports and the way mainstream medicine insists upon “protecting” the public from functional medicine. Both old-guard institutions seem to have found the quicksand of benevolence combined with their conflicting interests and a need to preserve public ignorance.

For a far more informed, thorough, uplifting and optimistic summary and assessment of the government’s UFO/UAP report, please check out the fearless, widely loved and respected George Knapp and his recent TV reports linked here and here.

…

Love enough to face the truth without fear,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

“We are a cancer and there is no cure,” – TV News Industry Leader

10 Comments

Perhaps you’ve heard that Ariana N. Pekary, an MSNBC producer, left her job without first lining up another one.

I’ve done this twice in my career as a pathologist, so I know just how insufferable a job needs to become before a person goes out on this limb and saws it off.

Ariana explains her decision on her blog: here…

You may not watch MSNBC but just know that this problem still affects you, too. All the commercial networks function the same – and no doubt that content seeps into your social media feed, one way or the other.

How does this cancer affect all commercial networks?

It forces skilled journalists to make bad decisions on a daily basis.

More specifically…

It’s possible that I’m more sensitive to the editorial process due to my background in public radio, where no decision I ever witnessed was predicated on how a topic or guest would “rate.” The longer I was at MSNBC, the more I saw such choices — it’s practically baked in to the editorial process – and those decisions affect news content every day. Likewise, it’s taboo to discuss how the ratings scheme distorts content, or it’s simply taken for granted, because everyone in the commercial broadcast news industry is doing the exact same thing.

Is this just the opinion of one disgruntled producer?

…behind closed doors, industry leaders will admit the damage that’s being done.

“We are a cancer and there is no cure,” a successful and insightful TV veteran said to me. “But if you could find a cure, it would change the world.”

In what way?

As it is, this cancer stokes national division, even in the middle of a civil rights crisis. The model blocks diversity of thought and content because the networks have incentive to amplify fringe voices and events, at the expense of others… all because it pumps up the ratings.

Here’s a heuristic worth remembering: The more you yearn to silence your opponents, the more subjective your opinions.

Unfortunately, Ariana’s resignation has been misused as evidence that a conservative bias is superior to a liberal bias.

This misses the point entirely!

Diversity of opinion sustains life.

Monopoly is life’s enemy, whether it’s an invasive species wiping out native life forms or a monopoly of opinion wiping out voices of dissent.

When google’s artificial intelligence locks you into an echo chamber of bias, it doesn’t matter which chamber you’re in. They’ve got you. You will make bad decisions because you have been rendered unable to apply rational thought to the opinions of the other side, the opinions that would normally offer you some diversity.

Diversity is the lifeblood of free will. Without it, we become puppets of google’s AIs or other totalitarian forces.

When TV news industry leaders privately admit that “we are a cancer,” and a cure would “change the world,” where can we turn?

In my humble and yet infallible opinion, (ha, ha) the cure is educating ourselves on the UFO phenomenon and the intelligent mind(s) behind it, possibly aliens of both physical and ethereal substance. Possibly “breakaway” Earthlings of some variety.

Whether or not this idea sounds completely nuts to you now, it’s nearly certain that after you’ve spent a year or two acquainting yourself with the world’s most credible UFO data, you’ll find your devotion to conservative and/or liberal politics fading into a broader perspective.

Humanity is one. Philosophical and political diversity are as essential to our survival as genetic and spiritual diversity.

Love to both sides of the aisle,

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD

“Some secret too terrible to be told…”

4 Comments

I’m at a loss to grasp why this story isn’t front-page news. The Navy has now officially admitted that the UFO/ “UAP” phenomenon is a genuine mystery and the famous videos are not a hoax or explainable by any traditional means.

Here’s a mainstream TV report on the Navy’s official statement…

Here’s a link to the NBC News report from yesterday (9/18/19):

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/navy-confirms-videos-did-capture-ufo-sightings-it-calls-them-n1056201

Notice that the closing lines of this mainstream article seek to shepherd public opinion toward status quo denial:

“Shostak, a regular contributor to NBC News MACH, said in an email, “Now I think if the answer were easy, that would be known by now. But when I look at these things I see no reason to consider them good evidence for ‘alien visitation,’ which is what the public likes to think they are.”

“He said that in some reported sightings of unidentified flying objects other explanations, like birds, seem plausible.”

If you’ve been keeping up with the Navy’s UFO sightings since 2017, you know exactly how irrelevant and beyond absurd that last sentence is. And yet these are professional journalists. Their deliberate ignorance is mindboggling.

If you haven’t kept up with all this UFO news, here’s a link to several relevant videos:

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=U.S.+NAVY+OFFICIAL+CONFIRMS+NIMITZ+U.F.O.+SIGHTINGS&atb=v182-1&pn=1&iax=videos&ia=videos

Among them is this video. If you ignore the melodramatic delivery of the narrator, it’s the best video for hearing what the witnesses have to say and how they say it…

Some experts tell us there’s reason to think the most advanced human space technology has now slipped not only out of the hands of elected US officials but also out of the control of covert US groups such as the “dark” or unacknowledged projects of the Department Of Defence. The story is, years ago several subdivisions of the DOD placed our most advanced anti-gravity technology into the hands of private corporations to move it beyond legal discoverability by our elected officials whom they distrusted.

That would be understandable. Anyone would be nieve to trust those people with a box of plastic forks.

If the story is true, maybe all we’re dealing with here are global corporations and their proprietary technology. I hope that’s the case, and I wouldn’t be surprised if the story or a similar conspiracy theory accounts for a large part of the UFO phenomena.

But I doubt it’s the whole truth. I’m keeping my mind open to the possibility of an alien component. It seems prudent at this point.

And I hope Nick Pope’s fears of “some secret too terrible to be told” are not justified.

…

Morrill Talmage Moorehead, MD